Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Author: qbcz

August undefined, 2024

WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras v/sMysore Chromite Limited Case Referred 44 of 1948 Decided On, 29 March 1951 At, High Court of Judicature at Madras By, THE … WebCIT vs. Sugauli Sugar Works (P) Ltd. 236 ITR 518 followed in CIT vs. Abdul Ahad 247 ITR 710 (J&K) wherein CIT vs. T.vs.S. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd. 222 ITR 344 (SC) …

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras v. Mysore Chromite Limited

WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras v/sMysore Chromite Limited Case Referred 44 of 1948 Decided On, 29 March 1951 At, High Court of Judicature at Madras By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYANARAYANA RAO & THE HONOURABLE MR. C. S. Rama Rao Saheb, T. T. Viswanatha Ayyar, Advocates. Judgment Text … WebThe Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Mysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) DAS, SUDHI RANJAN MAHAJAN, MEHAR CHAND (CJ) HASAN, GHULAM BHAGWATI, NATWARLAL H. Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (Act XI of 1922), s. 4-Profits derived by the assesseeWhether arose or were received in British Indian in the … sideshow who will love me as i am

Ug III CC August 2024 PDF Jurisprudence - Scribd

Web2 I.C.D.S Ltd v. CIT [2013] 29 taxmann.com 129 (SC) The Supreme Court in the case of Poddar Cement (P.) Ltd.3 and Mysore Minerals Ltd.4 observed that it is the beneficial ownership and not the titular ownership that is relevant for a valid claim of depreciation allowance under the Act. However, in the instant case, the Supreme Court WebJan 14, 2013 · In the opinion of the CIT (Appeals), the language used in the rules clearly specified that enhanced depreciation allowance is available only when the trucks are used in the business of running them on hire also. The appellant has only a leasing business and it does not run a business of hiring trucks to the public. http://lawfaculty.du.ac.in/files/course_material/VI_Term2024/LB-604%20Principles%20of%20Taxation%20Law.pdf the play yard phuket

Supreme Court Judgments: November, 1954 Law Library

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras v. Mysore Chromite Limited …

WebA Note on State of Madras v. Ramalingam & Co., A.I.R. 1956 Mad. 695 - Mahalinga Padmanabhan - There would seem to be a conflict between this decision and the one … WebApr 9, 2016 · The management and control of the assessee company was vested in Messrs. Oakley Bowden & Co. (Madras) Ltd., another private limited company … side shuffle touch exerciseWebFeb 24, 2016 · Among the factors the court should consider in making this decision are: (1) the weight accorded the plaintiff's choice of forum; (2) the place where the operative facts … side shuffle on treadmill benefits

"WebMysore Chromite Ltd . (1) held that in respect of the five cases in which the assessee drew the bills in favour of the buyers the sales were effected in Pakistan whereas in the two cases in which the bills were drawn in favour of the assessee's agent at Calcutta, the sales were effected in India. (1) 27 I.T.R. 128. 140 " - Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... vs Mysore Chromite …

WebNov 3, 2024 · CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 Posted on June 30, 2024 CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Continue reading Posted in LLB III Sem, Special Contracts, Topic 7: Effects of Sale, Uncategorized Leave a comment WebMar 11, 2011 · Mysore Minerals Ltd. (2) 2001 250 ITR...725 Kar This was a case in respect of mining of granite. The Division Bench held that it would amount to manufacture relying on an earlier judgment in CIT v. Mysore Minerals Ltd. (1... Deputy Commissioner Of …

Did you know?

WebJan 12, 2024 · CIT (A) has upheld the disallowance of Rs.77,18,481/-being claim of sustainable development expenses by simply recording the fact that “assessee has not adduced any cogent argument for deleting the sustainable development expenses”, without going into the fact that in the earlier years, sustainable development expenses are being … WebJUDGMENT Decision of Madras High Court in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS v. MYSORE CHROMITE LTD. [1951] (20 I. T. R. 546) affirmed. Appeal from …

WebMysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) January February March April May June July August September October November December. The … WebVodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. Assistant CIT, 2010 Tax LR, 618 (Ker) 14. State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. ... CIT V/s Mysore Chromite Ltd.; 1955, 1 SCR 849. 2. Badri Prasad V/s State of M.P.; 1965, 3 SCR 381. 3. ... The Mogu Liner Ltd. Vs. Manipal Printers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1991 Ker, 183 5. Indian Airlines Vs.

Websentative of some of the Indian chromite deposits in Andhra, Bihar, Orissa, Mysore and Madras, and include one specimen from Baluchistan in Pakistan. The location of the main chromite deposits of India is indi-cated on the accompanying sketch map. UsBs on CnnourrB Chromite is used for various purposes which can be classed as metal- WebCIT vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority (2010) 322 ITR 61 (P & H) 14.S. 22 - INCOME FROM HOUSE PROPERTY – BUSINESS INCOME - S. 28 . Rent from premises with fittings. Appointment between business income and income from house property held to be justified. CIT & Anr. vs. Mysore Inter Continental Hotel P. Ltd. (2010) 322 ITR 116 …

WebMar 9, 2024 · PR CIT Vs LH Sugar Factory Pvt Ltd (D ated: February 27, 2024) On appeal, the Supreme Court condones the delay and grants leave to the Revenue to defend their case against M/s L H Sugar Factory in relation to issue of carbon credit. 2024-TIOL-102-SC-IT CIT Vs Balak Capital Pvt Ltd (D ated: February 27, 2024)

WebCIT vs Divine Leasing and Finance Ltd., General Exports and Credits Ltd., Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. Citation 299 ITR 268 197 Taxation 43 158 Taxman 440 207 CTR 38 LexReported COCA-COLA EXPORT CORPORATION vs ITO and ANR.Applied 231 ITR 200 CIT vs Stellar Investment Ltd Distinguished and explained 192 ITR 287 Nirma Industries Ltd. … side shuffle on the treadmillWebMysore Chromite Ltd. (27 ITR 128)(SC), the Supreme court held that the property in the goods passed in London where the bill of lading was handed over to the buyer’s bank … the play yard treorchyhttp://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/ms-i-c-d-s-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-income-tax-mysore-anr side shrimpinghttp://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/ms-i-c-d-s-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-income-tax-mysore-anr the play yard walesWebCIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98. 37. P.S.N.S. Ambalavana Chettiar v. Express Newspapers Ltd. (1968) 2 SCR 239 : AIR 1968 SC 741. 38. Agricultural Market Committee v. Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. (1997) 5 SCC 516 : AIR 1997 SC 2502. 39. Pearson v. the play yard weymouthWebMysore Chromite Limited . DAS, J.— This is an appeal from the judgment pronounced by the High Court of Judicature at Madras on 29th March, 1951 on a consolidated reference … the play zone inc lafayette inWebsentative of some of the Indian chromite deposits in Andhra, Bihar, Orissa, Mysore and Madras, and include one specimen from Baluchistan in Pakistan. The location of the … side shuffle with arm swing