R bernard v enfield council 2002

Author: nekv

August undefined, 2024

WebMar 21, 2024 · Bernard & another v Enfield London Borough Council (25 October 2002) (Unreported) (Admin Court) S21 National Assistance Act 1948 – suitable accommodation … WebOct 25, 2002 · MR H HARROP-GRIFFITHS (instructed by London Borough of Enfield, Legal Services Department) appeared on behalf of the DEFENDANT. This is a claim for …

Human Rights: Our Rights - Disability Justice

WebDecision/Outcome. The High Court granted the declaration. The Court held that to determine whether the benefit of the covenant ran with the land, it should be assessed whether there … WebIn R (on the application of Bernard) v Enfield London Borough Council (2002), the failure by the council to provide suitably adapted accommodation for the applicant and her family … builtin_function_or_method是什么

Greenfield, R (on the application of) v. Secretary of State for the ...

WebThe aims of this thesis are to determine to what extent the Crown remains important as a source of legitimacy for the constitutional order and as a focus of sovereignty; how the … WebThe 2002 Enfield Borough Council election took place on 2 May 2002 to elect members of Enfield London Borough Council in London, England. The whole council was up for … WebSection 189A of the Housing Act 1996 - Housing Assessments and Personal Housing Plans For Homeless Persons. YR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Lambeth … builtin_function_or_method とは

Legal database - View: Cases: Enfield City Corporation v.

House of Lords - Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home …

WebMar 21, 2024 · J v Enfield LBC (High Court, 4 March 2002) Section 17 Children Act 1989 – duty to provide accommodation – section 2 Local Government Act. An assessment as to … WebMar 23, 2024 · Cited – Adams v Bracknell Forest Borough Council HL 17-Jun-2004. A attended the defendant’s schools between 1977 and 1988. He had always experienced … crunch texture imagesWebAug 15, 2024 · 40. Mr McKendrick QC has reminded the court of the generous ambit of Article 5.4 which entitles a person to speedy consideration by a court and in particular has referred to the case of Waite v the United Kingdom ECHR 2002. Article 5.4 is first and foremost a guarantee of a fair procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of detention. builtin_function_or_method是什么意思

"WebJul 11, 2024 · Bernard, Regina (on the Application of) v London Borough of Enfield: Admn 25 Oct 2002. The claimants were husband and wife. They had six children. The wife was … " - R bernard v enfield council 2002

R bernard v enfield council 2002

Bradbury v Enfield London Borough Council on JustisOne

WebMay 22, 2014 · It was only at a hearing on March 21, 2002 that the defendant first conceded that it did owe a duty to the claimants under s.21 . Eventually, the claimants were offered … WebMar 24, 2024 · Mr CMG Ockelton, Vice President of the Upper Tribunal, said in Neophytou & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Enfield Council [2024] EWHC 521 (Admin): “The truth of the matter is that the facts were uncontentiously not as the claimants asserted, and the reliable evidence all points to the position taken by the council; but it is sufficient for ...

Did you know?

WebJun 17, 1999 · LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD. (RESPONDENTS) ON 17 JUNE 19999. LORD BROWNE-WILKINSON. My Lords, When the plaintiff was 10 months old, he was the … WebTRVA [1967] EWCA Civ J0823-1 Ruth Bradbury (Married Woman) & Ors. (Appellants) The Mayor Aldermen and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield (Respondents) THE …

WebTW v Enfield London Borough Council. [2014] EWCA Civ 362 B; [2014] WLR (D) 145. CA: Arden, Aikens, Christopher Clarke LJJ: 27 March 2014. When an approved social worker … WebJun 8, 2011 · In her judgment, Laffoy J. made extensive reference to the English court decisions in R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC and Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC. In O’Donnell v …

WebCounsel also relied on the decisions of Sullivan J in R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC [2002] EWHC 2282 (Admin), [2003] HRLR 111, para 45, Stanley Burnton J in R (KB) v South London and … WebDoherty & Another v. South Dublin County Council [2007] IEHC 4; Lawrence v. Ballina Town Council, 5813P/2003, 31 July 2008 . R (Bernard) v. London Borough of Enfield [2002] EWHC Admin 2282. Donegan v. Dublin City Council & Others [2008] IEHC 288. McCann v. United Kingdom, Application No. 19009/04, 13 May 2008. Oguekwe v. Minister for Justice ...

WebDec 4, 2001 · 1. This is an appeal by Mr Eston Bernard from the order of His Honour Judge Hodge sitting in the Edmonton County Court on 1 December 2000. The judge dismissed …

WebJul 28, 2011 · Whereas reliance had been placed on R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC [2002] EWHC 2282 (Admin), what was striking about that case was the contrast between it and this one. … crunch the crocodile ebookWebJun 3, 2024 · Short term interim solutions had been proposed by the council but turned down (understandably) by Mr I. It was hard to see what else the council could have done … crunch textureWebMar 4, 2002 · Mr. Bryan McGuire (instructed by London Borough of Enfield) for the Defendant. This application for judicial review is concerned with two decisions of the … builtin function or method是什么意思WebJun 17, 1999 · LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD. (RESPONDENTS) ON 17 JUNE 19999. LORD BROWNE-WILKINSON. My Lords, When the plaintiff was 10 months old, he was the subject of a care order in favour of the defendant, London Borough of Enfield. He remained in the care of the defendant council until he was aged 17. builtin_function_or_method类型转换WebKey point. This case first in a trilogy of decisions pre-Human Rights Act including W v Essex CC and Phelps v Hillingdon LBC where the Lords showed a sceptical attitude towards … built in function in stringWebSee the report of the decision of Jacobs J in the equitable jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of New South Wales: Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council v Cooney (1962) 8 LGRA 8 at 13-14. … crunch the crocodile clip artWebIn Marshall, from November 1998 to March 1999, a group of 35 Mi’kmaq Indians were accused of cutting down trees in Nova Scotia without proper authorization, contrary to … crunch the crocodile art